DIVORCE JUDGEMENT
OF THE NAME OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Judge of Court district №210 of Saint Petersburg Baranova E.V. by the secretary Rasskazova A.U. with Plaintiff [the name keeps in secret] (Plaintiff, wife) have considered in public court hearing civil case of divorce by complaint of Plaintiff to Defendant [the name keeps in secret] (Defendant, husband),
ESTABLISHED:
The wife addressed judge with complaint to the husband to terminate the marriage, stated that she entered into the marriage with Defendant on June 26, 2013; parties do not have unemancipated children as a result of the marriage. The marriage has broken down irretrievably since April, 2016, there are no economic issues; parties live separate and apart from each other and further mutual life is impossible.
Plaintiff appeared in court, supported the claims, requested fulfill her claims and stated, that on February 27, 2016 Plaintiff and Defendant entered into Settlement Agreement, defining property right of spouses and determining termination of the marriage between parties in Russian Federation.
Defendant was aware of the intention of Plaintiff to terminate the marriage, because Plaintiff personally sent Verified Complaint to the Defendant to his address. Verified Complaint has been received by Defendant, which can be proved by a postal receipt.
Defendant failed to appear in court hearing, although, he was served properly with place and time of court hearing by postal correspondence (page 19). Court considers possible according to article 167 of the Civil Procedural Code of Russia to proceed the hearing in the absence of the Defendant.
Court considered the facts and explanations of Plaintiff, decided the following:
According to part 1 article 160 of the Family Codex of RF dissolution of the marriage between citizens of Russian Federation and foreign citizens on the territory of Russian Federation implement in accordance of legislation of Russian Federation.
By paragraph 2, article 22 of the Family Codex of RF dissolution of the marriage with judicial intervention implement if established by the court that further mutual life and restoration of conjugal are impossible.
Findings of fact.
• On June 26, 2013 marriage between Parties was registered in Horry County Court in South Carolina;
• On February 27, 2016 Plaintiff and Defendant entered into Settlement Agreement, defining property right of spouses and determining termination of the marriage between parties in Russian Federation;
• The marriage has broken down irretrievably since April, 2016;
• There are no economic issues;
• Parties live separate and apart from each other and further mutual life is impossible.
Considering the facts, Court ordered and adjudged to dissolve the marriage registered on June 26, 2013 between Parties.
Pursuing articles 194-199 Civil Procedural Code of Russian Federation
DECIDED:
Terminate the marriage between Husband and Wife, registered on June 26, 2013 by the Court in cases of inheritance, wills and guardianship Horry County in South Carolina, United States, entry №2013-188675.
This decision could be appealed in Smolninskiy Regional Court in Saint Petersburg within one month by filling motion to the Court district №210 of Saint Petersburg.
Judgment shall be made in even of submission by the parties, participating in the case, their legal representatives request for preparation of judgment, which can be filled within three days from announcement of resolution part of the court decision in even when parties, participating in the case, their legal representatives have been present at the court hearing and within fifteen days from announcement of resolution part of the court decision in even when parties, participating in the case, their legal representatives have not been present at the court hearing.
Judge [Seal with Insignia] Signature E.V. Baranova
Judgment prepared on July 20, 2016