Divorce Judgement

JUDGMENT

IN THE NAME OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

March XX, 2009 Moscow city

Justice of the Peace of court district No. XXX of Sokolniki District of Moscow city Ms. XXXXXXXXXXXX, temporary acting as the Justice of the Peace of court district No. XXX of Preobrazhensky District of Moscow, with Clerk to justices Ms. XXXXXXXXXXXX,

Having considered in open court session the civil case based on the suit of Mr. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX against Ms. XXXXXXXXXXXXX claiming marriage dissolution,

HAS ESTABLISHED:

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX applied to the court with a suit against XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX claiming dissolution of marriage. Substantiating the declared claim he stated that has been married to the defendant since August XX, 20XX. They have no children in the wedlock. Cohabitation with the defendant has failed. Marital relations between the parties were stopped more than six months ago, they do not have common household. Further cohabitation of retaining of the family is impossible. The parties have no disputes as regards separation of common property. On the ground of the above stated the plaintiff asks to dissolve the marriage between him and the defendant, specifying that the defendant is avoiding the marriage dissolution by Civil Records Authorities.

The plaintiff’s representative, attorney at law Ms. K.M. Krasnova supported the plaintiff’s claims in full.

Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX failed to appear before the court, according to the report of Mr. XXXXXXXXXXXX District Police Officer of DIA Preobrazhenskoye District Ms. XXXXXXXXXXXX does not reside at the address: XX Bolshaya XXXXXXXXXX St., Apt. XX, Moscow, the apartment has been leased, so the place of her residence is unknown, which means that pursuant to Art. 119 of RF CPC the Justice of Peace believes it possible to commence the consideration of this civil case absente reo.

The court having read the suit, having examined the case papers, and having assessed the weight of evidence believes that the suit is justified and subject to satisfaction on the following grounds:

The court session has established that the parties have been married since August 19, 2006. They have no children in the wedlock.

Cohabitation with the defendant has failed. Marital relations between the parties were stopped more than six months ago, they do not have common household. Further cohabitation of preservation of the family is impossible. The parties have no disputes as regards separation of common property. The plaintiff rejects any reconciliation, insisting on marriage dissolution. The defendant is avoiding the marriage dissolution by Civil Records Authorities

Pursuant to Art. 22 of RF Family Code the marriage may by dissolved in a judicial procedure if the court establishes that further cohabitation of spouses and retaining of family is impossible.

Under the circumstances, taking into account the facts that the plaintiff insists on marriage dissolution, marital relations between the parties have been stopped, location the defendant is unknown, the court believes that the marriage is formal, and is subject to dissolution, because further cohabitation of spouses and retaining of family is impossible.

On the ground of above stated, pursuant to articles 21-23 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation, being governed by Articles 194-198 of RF CPC, the court

HAS RESOLVED:

To dissolve the marriage registered on August XX, 20XX in the Wedding Palace No. 4 of Civil Records Department of Moscow (entry No, XXXX) between Mr. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX against Ms. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (nee XXXXXXXXXXXXXX).

The judgment may be appealed against at Preobrazhensky District court of Moscow city within 10 days through Justice of the Peace of court district No. XXX of Sokolniki District of Moscow city.

The ruling has come into effect on April 06, 2009

Justice of the Peace (signed)