Services are provided in native languages by bilingual attorneys: divorces, local and international, consultations about family matters by top experts, Hague Convention, child support, alimony, adoptions, wills and trusts, legalization of foreign divorces, registration and legalization of foreign documents, apostilles, mid-marriage agreements and prenuptials, restoration of vital documents, all matter related to the United States, former USSR territories, Europe, Israel and Australia.

Divorce Judgement

National Emblem of the Ukraine

Case № 2-2845/11

JUDGMENT

IN THE NAME OF THE UKRAINE

Date:

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX District Court of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX composed of

Presiding Judge

in open court considered the civil case initiated on the grounds of the action for divorce brought by XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX against XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX and

DISCOVERED THE FOLLOWING:

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX brought an action for divorce against XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX in July 2011.

In the statement of claim Plaintiff stated that he and Defendant were married on August 06, 2008 at the Tsentralny Marriage Registration Office of Kiev with the Family Support Center. There are no children born of this marriage.

The Defendant didn’t try to establish marital relations after registration of the marriage and tried to avoid living together on various excuses. The parties live in different countries up to the present day.

Plaintiff also stated that the marriage was irretrievably broken and required to dissolve the marriage between him and Defendant. He also requested to try the case in his absence subject to giving a notice to his attorney.

Plaintiff’s attorney supported the claim and requested the court to satisfy the claim.

Defendant didn’t appear before the court and submitted a motion for trial of the case in her absence. She admitted the claim and raised no objection to the dissolution of the marriage. The defendant requested her last name after the dissolution of the marriage.

The court studied the materials of the case and discovered the following:

The parties were married on August 06, 2008 which is certified by record № XXXX in the register of marriages. The marriage was registered at the Tsentralny Marriage Registration Office of Kiev with the Family Support Center.

There are no children born of this marriage.

Parties do not maintain marital relations and live in different countries.

The family was broken due to lack of understanding between parties, different approach to life and spousal obligations.

Based on Art. 112, part 2 of the Family Code of the Ukraine the court does hereby order that the marriage should be dissolved if it is discovered that further joint residence and maintenance of marital relations is in conflict with interests of one of the spouses or their children.

The circumstances of the case give the court reasons to believe that maintenance of marital relations is in conflict with the interests of the parties therefore the marriage should be dissolved.

The defendant shall have last name XXXXXXXXXXXXXX after the dissolution of the marriage.

Hereby the court satisfies the claim of Plaintiff.

Based on Art. 14, 57-59, 208, 209, 212-215, 218 of the Code of Civil Procedures of the Ukraine and Art. 104, 105, 110, 112, 113 of the Family Code of the Ukraine, the court does hereby

RESOLVE TO:

Satisfy the claim of Plaintiff against Defendant.

Dissolve the marriage between parties, registered on August 08, 2008 at the Tsentralny Marriage Registration Office of Kiev with the Family Support Center, register record № XXXX.

The defendant shall have last name XXXXXXXXXXXXXX after the dissolution of the marriage.

This judgment may be appealed in the Court of Appeal of Poltava Region through XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX District Court of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Town by lodging an appeal within ten days from the date of announcement of the judgment. The parties which didn’t participate in the case or were not present when the judgment was announced shall have the right to appeal the judgment within ten days from the date of receipt of a copy hereof. No appeal lodged upon expiration of the mentioned term will be considered unless the court finds grounds to restore such term by request of the appellant.

Judge: signature

The judgment became final on October 31, 2011.

Judge: signature

Seal:

Articles and consultations authored by attorney reflect the state of law as of the date of their writing. The laws change daily. Users of this site are advised to consult attorney regarding their situation.
russian divorce services Payment by credit card
Divorce
The highest compliment you can pay me is the referral of a friend or a relative.
+1-212-205-2211 New York
+1-212-574-3288 New York (Fax)
+1-617-850-9199 Boston
+1-310-929-8444 Los Angeles
+7-495-662-8721 Moscow
+7-921-946-0582 St.Petersburg
+7-812-309-5697 St.Petersburg (fax)

Divorce in Russia ©

Copyright © 1998-2020

Russian attorney at law Karina Duvall.

Terms and conditions of Russian-Divorce PC

LI